Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Think Long, But Not Too Hard. Part 1: China Envy

In this two-part posting, I explore the mindset of billionaires through the lens of the Nicolas Berggruen Institute's report, A Blueprint to Renew California: Report and Recommendations Presented by the Think Long Committee for California.  This Think Long committee was comprised of a select group of politicians and corporate leaders, including billionaire pseudo-reformer Eli Broad and do no evil Google's Eric Schmidt.  On education issues, the committee was informed by none other than Michelle Rhee.  While this report may have no real legislative impact in the long-run, it provides insight to the minds of the 1% and their questionable concern for the well-being of American public education.

We Americans seem to have a bad case of China envy.  Time and again we are told by politicians and business leaders that if we do not pull ourselves up out of our downward spiral of educational and entrepreneurial slacker-dom, the Chinese will eat us for lunch. 

The Blueprint to Renew California states in its opening paragraph on k-12 education reform:
Quality K-12 education is the foundation of any solid middle class society, providing opportunities for upward mobility. This is especially so in a knowledge economy that faces stiff competition globally and where students in other countries from Singapore to South Korea to China outperform California’s students. To ensure the state’s long-term competitiveness, California schools must be brought up to global standards.
Never mind Tienanmen Square, we must strive for global standards!  This rhetoric is unfounded, to say the least.  Being like China will not help us much, and certainly not in education.  While Berggruen's committee might be thinking long, they obviously didn't think very hard.  Just ask the Chinese.

A recent NPR report, China's Rich Consider Leaving Growing Nation , did just that in exploring why China's millionaires are looking to get green cards in America.  Are they coming over to eat us for lunch?  According to the report:
Last fiscal year, nearly 3,000 well-to-do Chinese applied for investor green cards in the U.S. That's up from just 270 four years ago.  A recent survey by Bank of China and Hurun, a company that tracks China's rich, found that 60 percent of Chinese millionaires have either emigrated, are in the process of doing so or are thinking about it.  A China Merchant's Bank Report found the top reason was a better education for their children. The second: protecting assets.
In a story about wealthy Chinese protecting their assets from an unpredictable government, I was surprised to hear the number one reason why the wealthy are fleeing China: better education for their children. 

The Chinese appreciate America.  They do not want to eat us for lunch, they want to eat lunch with us.

Stop the fear-mongering, start working to our strengths, and reclaim our public education!

Friday, January 13, 2012

Public Education is the 99%

It has been about five months since I last made a post.  During that time, my online presence has been more focused on the comment sections of news websites where there is active discussion on education topics and a variety of viewpoints being expressed.  These comment sections provide a thermometer for the state of the education reform debate.

One thing I have noticed is that the pseudo-reformer platform (ending teacher tenure, supporting charter schools over traditional, and instituting teacher evaluations based on testing) is losing popular interest.  While many states have instituted reforms over the last year, an equal number have probably failed to materialize.  Wherever pseudo-reformer poster child Michelle Rhee goes, she is followed by a mass of criticism and general pleas for her to leave whatever state in whose business she is meddling.  The voices of opposition, such as Diane Ravitch, are being heard more loudly in the mainstream media.

Furthermore, the data are not supporting the claims.  Charter school effectiveness is being questioned.  States are having a hard time enacting the reforms required of federal Race To The Top funds.  In all, the policies are failing, or at least not producing real and viable improvement in the American education system.

These last five months also saw the growth of the Occupy movement and the distinction between the 99% and the 1%.  The billionaire pseudo-reformers and political power-elite land squarely in the 1%, and the Occupy movement has helped to shine a light on the questionable motives of education reform - does the 1% really have the interest of the 99% in mind? 

The Occupy movement has forced the public to reevaluate.  No longer is it the public versus the teacher and unions, which is what the billionaire funded movie Waiting for Superman instigated, but now it is the public versus the 1%.  It has been a welcome diversion and time will tell if it is a more fruitful one.

Despite these changes in the flow of opinion, the pseudo-reformers are still at it and senseless education reform is still being signed into law.  Perhaps, though, the biggest threat to education at this time is not the destruction of public education through the pseudo-reformer platform, but the destruction of education through de-funding.  While the 1% continue to increase their wealth and send their children to private schools, the 99% struggle to make ends meet, as do the public schools their children attend.

The irony is that any reform passed now is likely to go unfunded.  From Common Core Standards to Race To The Top (ironic because it is a grant) to state legislation, where will the money come from to institute the changes required? California's transportation budget is in danger of being completely slashed.  How can we educated the future of America if the children can't even get to school?

Don't let the 1% ruin education in America.  Reclaim public education for the 99%!